Selecting the right safety barriers for external yards is critical for protecting pedestrians, vehicles, and infrastructure. Traditionally, steel barriers have been the default choice due to their strength and durability, but polymer barriers have emerged as an alternative that offers impact absorption, flexibility, and reduced maintenance.
But can polymer barriers truly withstand the demands of external yards? How do they compare to steel barriers in terms of impact resistance, weather durability, and long-term costs? This guide provides an honest comparison to help you determine the right solution for your site.
Steel barriers—particularly Armco-style barriers—are known for their exceptional strength and ability to withstand high-force impacts, making them suitable for environments where HGVs and fast-moving vehicles operate.
However, there are key drawbacks:
Another common external yard option is key clamp steel barriers, which offer less impact resistance but are used primarily for guiding pedestrian and vehicle traffic. However, these barriers require frequent repainting for visibility, as paint doesn’t adhere well to galvanised steel due to its smooth, non-porous zinc coating.
Polymer barriers flex on impact, absorbing kinetic energy rather than transferring it. This reduces vehicle and infrastructure damage and minimises maintenance costs. They are particularly effective for forklift-heavy environments or HGV yards where frequent, lower-speed impacts are a concern.
However, they have limitations:
For most modern warehouse yards, logistics hubs, and industrial sites, polymer barriers provide a highly effective balance of impact protection and durability. However, for high-speed vehicle areas, steel may still be necessary.
While steel barriers are structurally strong, they have a major vulnerability—corrosion. Exposure to rain, humidity, and fluctuating temperatures can cause rust, weakening the barrier over time.
To combat this, steel barriers require:
Over time, rust and peeling paint can make steel barriers more of a liability than a safety measure.
One of the biggest advantages of polymer barriers is that they do not rust or corrode, making them well-suited for rain-exposed environments. They require virtually no maintenance when it comes to weather resistance.
However, extended exposure to UV rays can cause colour fading in most polymer barriers - although this is not an issue when it comes to Clarity MPM barriers. In fact, this is rarely an issue in the UK’s predominantly cloudy climate. But in sun-heavy environments, UV-resistant polymers should be considered, as for long-term outdoor use, polymer barriers provide superior weather resistance with minimal upkeep compared to steel.
Steel barriers typically have a lower initial cost, making them an attractive short-term solution. However, the hidden costs include:
Polymer barriers cost more upfront but eliminate many maintenance costs over their lifetime. Their impact-absorbing design prevents expensive vehicle and infrastructure repairs, leading to significant long-term savings.
However, businesses should consider:
For businesses focused on long-term savings, polymer barriers often prove to be the more cost-effective choice.
Choosing the right safety barrier depends on your site’s risks, vehicle speeds, and maintenance capacity.
For most external yard applications, polymer barriers provide a better balance of strength, resilience, and cost-effectiveness. However, every site is unique, and a safety assessment is crucial for making the best decision.
Find out more about polymer barriers here: Polymer Safety Barriers.
Want to discuss in more detail what might eb the bets option for you?